City Council meeting - 5/28/2025 12:00:00 AM

City Council meeting MINUTES

Council Chamber, 401 California Avenue, Boulder City NV 89005

May 27, 2025 - 5:00 PM


 

 

 

CALL TO ORDER
CONFIRMATION OF POSTING AND ROLL CALL

Council members present: Mayor Joe Hardy, Council Member Denise Ashurst, Council Member Cokie Booth, Council Member Sherri Jorgensen, Council Member Steve Walton (5)

Absent: None (0)

Also present: City Manager Ned Thomas, City Attorney Brittany Walker, City Clerk Tami McKay
City Clerk McKay will confirm that the agenda has been posted in accordance with Nevada Open Meeting Law.
INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Council member Steve Walton provided the invocation, and Mayor Hardy lead the Pledge of Allegiance. 
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mayor Hardy announced Garrett Junior High School Girls Soccer Team won the 2025 Clark County School District Division II Champions.

He said he appreciated the residents who supported Pride Month and recognized the members. 

He announced the Kindness Walk Day was a self-guided tour on Father’s Day, June 15.  He said it was an opportunity to appreciate kindness. 

Council Member Ashurst announced Vacation Bible School: Flight 3:16 was taking place in the community and more information was available on Facebook. She also shared the Patriots to Education outreach program, which supported military-affiliated individuals in pursuing second careers in public education in Nevada, would be posted on the city's social media pages.

Mayor Hardy said several dignitaries were at the Veterans Cemetery to honor those who had served and he said he was impressed with the messages.  He said when it concluded, he recognized Former Senator, Governor and Attorney General Richard Byran had been in attendance.  He said in 1987, as Governor, he signed for the creation of the Veterans Cemetery.  He said it was a sweet moment to talk to the person who made it happen.
PUBLIC COMMENT
 
Mayor Hardy opened the public comment period. 

Tim Charmin said there was a sense of pride in Boulder City.  He said he wanted to talk about the anti-camping and had a concern about star gazing in the park and falling asleep which would make him in violation of the ordinance.  He asked that this subject be considered so he was not awakened with a fine.

Brynn deLorimier said she had the same concerns about being woken up if she fell asleep at the park. She referenced the Mayor’s comment, “When we come across homelessness in this community, what do we do?” She said the Mayor alluded to somebody eating a jar of peanut butter with a spoon and said we try to help them by whatever means we can. She suggested a self-cleaning pod-style bathroom to help not criminalize the homeless.  She said her suggestion about the downtown parking was that the sidewalks should be made clear and enforced regularly.  She suggested a First Friday and rope off the downtown area every month with artisan musicians.  She also suggested ADA be included on See Click Fix.

Rose Ann Rabiola Miele said it took time to write bills and agenda items.  She questioned who the bill was targeting noting storing personal property was causing concern for City staff. She asked about the specific number in reference to the “growing number” of homeless people.  She said things got done in Boulder City, but asked about the reason and consequences and how it would be enforced.  She said she realized people did not like to look at people who didn’t have homes. She said she was informed the actual number of homeless people in Boulder City and said she was willing to help.

Ainsworth Hunt suggested tabling Item No.11 because there was no reason to spend money on the Nevada Way project. He said the plan was designed to help people with disabilities and only created a problem with the traffic.  He said the current plan proposed parallel parking and talked about crossing the street and trying to navigate Nevada Way.  He suggested the council use a wheel chair so they knew first hand.  He said he would appreciate the council tabling the item.

Jack Clary said he was a lifelong resident and said he had concerns on Item No. 8. He said he disagreed with the effect of the ordinance. He said everyone was a citizen and not everyone had a bed. He said in regards to purpose B. he said it interfered with the primary purpose of public areas and threatens the public health, safety, and welfare of the public. He said it was a subjective qualification. He said the citizens would have to pay the costs of someone being imprisoned from the offense and possibly increase homelessness. He referenced the 9th Circuit Court and referenced: Martin vs. City of Boise, Blake vs. City of Grants Pass, Jones vs. City of Los Angeles and Pottinger vs. City of Miami. He said he believed it was unfair to punish someone sleeping in the park.  He asked the Council to consider Item No. 8 carefully and who it may affect.  

Rod Walters said he supported the anti-camping bill.  He said just about every surrounding city had addressed it and it helped prevent a camp being set up.  He said the reference of a resident sleeping on a blanket in the park was far stretched.  He said Boulder City would attract more vagrancy if it was the only city who did not address the issue.  He said there was a recent Supreme Court case that reversed the 9th Circuit decision.  He said he strongly supported the bill and said the police could offer warnings before arresting them and they were good at doing that.  

Matt diTeresa said he was a 32 year resident of Boulder City.  He said the anti-camping law would not work well.  He said Boulder City promoted “Be Kind, Be Boulder”.  He said the downtown area should be enforced instead of forcing handicapped people into the elements without shade.  He said many of the homeless population were veterans.  He said he was strongly against both agenda items.  He said Boulder City depended on tourism revenue but expressed disregard for the needs of veterans and homeless individuals.

Cindy Swanson said there had been a lot of talk about ADA with respect to Nevada Way.  She said it was extremely difficult for anyone to walk through the tables and patrons regardless of having a disability. She said she would also like to own City property for $60 per year.

Cherebul Lob thanked the council for the Pride Month recognition. She said she was deeply affected by the issues surrounding ADA.  She said in regards to Nevada Way, there would be plenty of room for someone to walk if the current tables didn’t have so many chairs and if the areas were enforced.  She said the most vulnerable should not have to walk in the sun.  She said the anti-camping could affect people who were here to attend events.  

William Moorehead said he had been a 57 year resident of Boulder City.  He said he was in favor of Nevada Way needing new slurry seal, renovating crosswalks, and festival gates but was not in favor of eliminating parking spaces.  He said encroachments should be reconsidered. He said there were 23 businesses in existence currently and said over 80% were in compliance with the encroachment permits.  He said there were other areas in town who did not comply with encroachment permits.  He questioned future decisions by the Council and the concern about encroachment permits.  He said Arizona Street and Hotel Plaza was narrower and there was non compliance in that area, too, he said it was easier to tear up paper than tear up concrete.  

Cindy Blatchford, 28 year resident, said parking did not need to be changed on Nevada Way, rather parking changes needed to happen on Wyoming Street.  She asked that the encroachment permits be enforced. She referenced a picture taken in front of Grandma Daisy’s and suggested moving columns towards the eateries. She said it would provide adequate passage and suggested the item be tabled.

Beth Walker said she owned three businesses in Boulder City and one of hers would be impacted by the proposed changes to Nevada Way.  She said she understood infrastructure needed to be improved under the street because her business was affected by it.  She said she supported tabling the item and increasing enforcement. She said she had only signed an encroachment permit twice in 15 years.  She said she doesn’t have mobility issues but understood the problems.  She said she patronized the other businesses and has been a violator of encroachment. She said she thought a marked off area and resetting the table and chairs would be helpful.  She said parallel parking would create problems and said restaurants may come to the other side of the street in the future.

Jennifer Jeffries referenced the Four-Way Test and questioned if everything being considered tonight was fair to all concerned and if it would build goodwill and better friendships. She said Item No. 8 would not be beneficial to all concerned.  

Brandon Smith said he was very concerned about the ADA compliance on Nevada Way.  He said the compliance issue was the table and chairs on the sidewalk and how it was enforced.  He said there was an issue to expect someone to walk on the sidewalks in an unsheltered area.  He suggested rearranging the tables to largely eliminate the problem. He said he understood the need to improve the street and sidewalk and said it could be an easy fix to suggest the issue with the restaurants.

Pam Triolo said there were more off leash dogs in Boulder City than there were homeless people. She said the restaurants had been given the opportunity to stay within 4 feet, but they were not complying.  She said she agreed the road needed to be improved and the City should take advantage of the RTC funding.

Michelle Carol said she wanted to echo the comments of some of the earlier speakers and said she agreed compliance needed to be enforced.  She said parallel parking would slow down the traffic and cause congestion.  She said there were a lot of people who did not know how to paralell park.  She suggested enforcing scooters who speed down the sidewalk.  She asked that Item No. 11 be tabled.  

Nancy Denine asked to not reduce parking spots on Nevada Way. She said she lived in a home that looked down on homeless people.  She said she agreed homelessness was not a crime, but she felt intimidated by the homeless people who slept by her home.  She said she recently asked the police to do a wellness check on someone who hadn’t moved from a spot in the desert for 3 days. She asked for a better protocol to deal with homeless.

No further comments were offered and the public comment period was closed. 

Written public comments submitted prior to the meeting via public comment form or email are attached:

Brian Whittaker
Robin Gullo
Hutchins
Janelle Sorenson 
Katie Parris
Merissa Fletcher
Michell Geromel
Tanya Vece
Wendy Malek
Whitney Sanford
Edward and Lois Denaut
Pat Murphy
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION: APPROVAL OF REGULAR AGENDA
Motion: Approve
Moved by: Council Member Sherri JorgensenSeconded by: Council Member Cokie Booth
Vote:
Aye: Mayor Joe Hardy, Council Member Denise Ashurst, Council Member Cokie Booth, Council Member Sherri Jorgensen, Council Member Steve Walton (5)
Nay: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
Motion Passed
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION: APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA
Motion: Approve
Moved by: Council Member Steve WaltonSeconded by: Council Member Denise Ashurst
Vote:
Aye: Mayor Joe Hardy, Council Member Denise Ashurst, Council Member Cokie Booth, Council Member Sherri Jorgensen, Council Member Steve Walton (5)
Nay: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
Motion Passed
City Clerk McKay requested Item No. 4 be moved to the regular agenda and considered after Item No. 11.
CONSENT AGENDA
1.
For possible action: Approval of the May 13, 2025 City Council meeting minutes
A staff report was submitted by City Clerk Tami McKay and included in the May 27, 2025 City Council agenda packet.
2.
For possible action: Resolution No. 7966, a resolution of the City Council of Boulder City, Nevada, dedicating the new Six Companies Drive, from Yucca Street to Mescal Street, as Public Right-of-Way
A staff report was submitted by Public Works Director Gary Poindexter and included in the May 27, 2025 City Council agenda packet.
3.
For possible action: Resolution No. 7967, a resolution of the City Council of Boulder City, Nevada, declaring certain personal City property as surplus and available for disposal by public auction or other means
A staff report was submitted by Public Works Director Gary Poindexter and included in the May 27, 2025 City Council agenda packet.
4.
For possible action: Resolution No. 7968, a resolution of the City Council of Boulder City, Nevada, approving Agreement No. 25-029 (Interlocal Contract 3219) between the City of Boulder City and the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada to provide construction funding in the amount of $3,000,000.00 for the Arterial Reconstruction Program 2020-21, B.C. Project No. 20-1114-STR, and reallocate both the funding and expenditures of the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 capital budget
This item was moved from the Consent Agenda and considered after Item No. 11.

A staff report was submitted by Public Works Director Gary Poindexter and included in the May 27, 2025 City Council agenda packet. He explained revisions were included in the project without taking out any existing trees for the project.
Motion: Approve
Moved by: Council Member Steve WaltonSeconded by: Council Member Cokie Booth
Vote:
Aye: Mayor Joe Hardy, Council Member Denise Ashurst, Council Member Cokie Booth, Council Member Sherri Jorgensen, Council Member Steve Walton (5)
Nay: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
Motion Passed
5.
For possible action: Matters pertaining to public rights of way in the Eldorado Valley area:
 
A. Resolution No. 7969, a resolution of the City Council of Boulder City, Nevada, approving Agreement No. 25-032 between the City of Boulder City and City of Henderson to provide for the dedication of public rights-of-way and delineating roadway improvement and maintenance responsibilities for rights-of-way along existing roadway commonly known as Old US 95 and Spring Canyon Road
 
B. Resolution No. 7970, a resolution of the City Council of Boulder City, Nevada, approving Agreement No. 25-033 between the City of Boulder City and City of Henderson to provide for dedication of public rights-of-way and delineating roadway improvement and maintenance responsibilities for rights-of-way along existing Roadway commonly known as Silverline Road
 
C. Resolution No. 7971, a resolution of the City Council of Boulder City, Nevada, dedicating portions of land located within the Eldorado Valley Area commonly known as Old US 95, Spring Canyon Road, and Silverline Road as public rights-of-way as depicted in Exhibits A-G
A staff report was submitted by Public Works Director Gary Poindexter and included in the May 27, 2025 City Council agenda packet.
6.
For possible action: Matters pertaining to the dedication of Public Rights-of-Way for portions of the Northwest Quarter (NW ¼) of Section 26, Township 23 South, Range 63 East:
 
A. Resolution No. 7972, a resolution of the City Council of Boulder City, Nevada, approving a Parcel Map dedicating a 30’ public right-of-way of the western boundary of the North Half (N ½) of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼) of the Northeast Quarter (NE ¼) of the Northwest Quarter (NW ¼) of Section 26, Township 23 South, Range 63 East (PM-24-197)
 
B. Resolution No. 7973, a resolution of the City Council of Boulder City, Nevada, dedicating a portion of the North Half (N ½) of the Northeast Quarter (NE ¼) of the Northwest Quarter (NW ¼) of Section 26, Township 23 South, Range 63 East, as public right of way  
 
C. Resolution No. 7974, a resolution of the City Council of Boulder City, Nevada, dedicating a portion of the North Half (N ½) of the South Half (S ½) the Northwest Quarter (NW ¼) of the Northwest Quarter (NW ¼) of Section 26, Township 23 South, Range 63 East, as public right of way
A staff report was submitted by City Planner Nakeisha Lyon and included in the May 27, 2025 City Council agenda packet.
REGULAR AGENDA
PRESENTATIONS
7.
Presentation from Kim Lundgren, Chief Executive Officer of Kim Lundgren Associates, and Robert Burgy, Climate and Sustainability Program Manager of Clark County Department of Environment and Sustainability, regarding the All-In Community Sustainability and Climate Action Plan in Southern Nevada
A staff report was submitted by Utilities Director Joseph Stubitz and included in the May 27, 2025 City Council agenda packet.

Utilities Analyst Josh Hardy introduced the members from the All-In Sustainability Action Plan.

Robert Burgy, Climate and Sustainability Program Manager for Clark County’s Department of Environment and Sustainability and Kim Lundgren, CEO of Kim Ludren Associates provided an overview of the PowerPoint included in the packet.

Ms. Lundgren said throughout the process, there had been a consistent willingness to take action or already doing it.

Council member Jorgensen said Boulder City would increase in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and asked if this included Interstate 11.

Ms. Lundgren said highways weren’t always included, but they are using RTC’s model.  She said she could get back with the answer.

Council member Ashurst asked about the total amount of grant funding received since the larger grant they applied for had not been awarded. 

Ms. Lundgren shared the amounts they received in Clark County which was $1M. She talked about the implementation money in the amount of $5M that was not awarded to their project. 

Council member Ashurst asked if their were any concerns with the new EPA Secretary.

Mr. Burgy said they were working with local agencies to complete existing grants so there were no issues at this time.

In response to Council member Ashurst, Mr. Burgy responded about EV chargers and said they were aware it wasn’t always feasible for someone to own an electric vehicle and said they monitored federal changes.

Ms. Lundgren said 90,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide was equivalent to green house emissions from 21,000 gasoline powered passenger vehicles emitting CO2 in one year.  

Council Member Ashurst referenced statistics, noting that while her granddaughter could be affected, she believed water related issues pose a greater concern. She acknowledged experiencing various weather changes over the years but expressed skepticism about their broader implications.

Mayor Hardy highlighted the accolades Boulder City has received for its solar fields and asked whether that had been taken into account.

Ms. Lundgren said yes they were promoted and the team worked with Joe Stubitz.  

Mayor Hardy said before I-11 a lot of traffic came through Boulder City and asked if the differences had been considered.

Ms. Lundgren said smog would have improved, but it’s not a factor for greenhouse gas emissions. 

In response to Mayor Hardy, Ms. Lundgren said the State of Nevada had a renewable portfolio standard that required NV Energy to meet 50% of its generation from renewable sources by 2023. She said the number one source currently was natural gas. 
BILLS
8.
For possible action: Consideration of Bill No. 2079, an ordinance of the City of Boulder City, Nevada amending Title 7, Police Regulations, Chapter 5, Public Land Use of the Boulder City Municipal Code to prohibit camping, sleeping, and storing personal property in a public place
Mayor Hardy called for a recess at 6:29 p.m.

Mayor Hardy called the meeting back to order at 6:49 p.m.

A staff report was submitted by City Attorney Brittany Walker and included in the May 27, 2025 City Council agenda packet.

City Attorney Walker provided an overview of the Staff report noting there was a growing issue across Clark County including Boulder City.  She said it was an issue that was not easy to resolve.  She said this would provide the tools to clean up personal property and direct people to appropriate services.  She talked about the Community Liaison Jennifer Headland who had reached out to numerous homeless persons and directed them to needed services.  She said camping would be allowed on undeveloped land with a no-fee permit for 14 days and camping in conjunction with special events.  She said the permit could be obtained through the Parks and Recreation Department.  

In response to Council member Walton, City Attorney Walker confirmed the Supreme Court of the United States overturned the 9th Circuit’s decisions. She also addressed the permit requirements were not detailed within the ordinance rather it included enabling language in the ordinance for the Parks and Recreation administration.  She said if a fee were going to be required, it would have to be approved by resolution at a Council meeting.  

Council member Walton said enjoying the park would not be called out and considered camping.

City Attorney Walker said it would maximize the public enjoyment of the parks.

Council member Jorgensen asked about the existing protocol for homeless individuals.

City Attorney Walker said the police offered the homeless information about food and shelter and provide bus passes to shelters.  

In response to Council member Jorgensen, City Attorney Walker said Clark County was provided funding for homeless resources. She said it was modeled after the surrounding cities and would make it unlawful to camp on City land without a permit. She said it would also make it unlawful to camp within 20 feet of building entrances so access could be open to the public.  

Council member Jorgensen said she was sensitive to the matter. She said it was a huge problem that needed to be fixed. She said Boulder City had businesses that should be enjoyed by everyone and thanked the City Attorney for bringing the matter forward.

Council member Booth asked if someone could urinate in the park and if restrooms were available in all of the parks.

Parks and Recreation Director Calloway said restrooms were available at Bicentennial, Wilbur Square, Department of Water and Power, Veterans and Hemenway Park.

Council member Ashurst asked if the local group who camped on undeveloped land had concerns with the proposed ordinance.

Parks and Recreation Director Calloway said she reached out to the group and said they had no issues with the ordinance and the requirement to obtain a permit.

Council member Ashurst expressed concern about the 55% increased statistic and questioned the percentage.  She said she did outreach work with some of the homeless on a quarterly basis and said Rose Ann Rabiola Miele did it on a weekly basis. She said Boulder City was welcoming and did not believe anyone should be treated differently because of their home situation, color of skin or disabilities.  She said most of the homeless she encountered were friendly.  She suggested changing some of the wording, but believed something needed to be in place.

Mayor Hardy said he was concerned about someone falling asleep in the park stating he sometimes falla asleep in the park.

Police Chief Shea said there were always concerns about possible enforcement. He said not everyone who sped received a ticket and said some received a warning.  He said the police were highly trained and tried to direct people towards services.  He said some homeless did not want to live in a shelter; some liked the street lifestyle.  He said violations must be beyond a reasonable doubt.  He said it was a burden to arrest someone and they looked for alternatives.  He said officers frequently warned people.  He said the ordinance would provide a tool for a law to back them up if someone was camping on public land for 48 hours.  He said the word was getting out to come to Boulder City to avoid being harassed. 

In response to Mayor Hardy, City Attorney Walker said the City of Henderson has had the law in place for approximately 2 years. She said Henderson offered information about services and provided transportation.

Council member Booth described a situation of a homeless person urinating in a bottle near her business and didn’t believe anyone would want their children to see this. She said she had encountered situations and believed it was a matter of safety.  She said she was in favor of the ordinance. 

Council member Ashurst asked if the bill could be modeled and adapted for Boulder City.

City Attorney Walker said the language had been adapted to Boulder City and reviewed by Staff.  She said it could be amended or revisited at a later date.

Council member Walton said the purpose was to regulate camping that may interfere with public areas or threaten the public health and welfare.  He said there were provisions included for residents to continue the enjoyment of camping on undeveloped land.

In response to Council member Ashurst asking how the public would be notified, City Clerk McKay explained the first public notice of the bill’s introduction occurred at the May 13th meeting. She said the notice was posted on bcnv.org, advertised in the Las Vegas Review Journal, and that the purpose of tonight’s meeting was to discuss and consider the bill.

City Attorney Walker said when there was a new law enacted, there was an education outreach period. She said the City informed the community the law would go into effect before making any citations or arrests. 
 
Motion: Approve
Moved by: Council Member Cokie BoothSeconded by: Council Member Steve Walton
Vote:
Aye: Mayor Joe Hardy, Council Member Denise Ashurst, Council Member Cokie Booth, Council Member Sherri Jorgensen, Council Member Steve Walton (5)
Nay: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
Motion Passed
REGULAR BUSINESS
9.
For possible action: Matters pertaining to an appeal (CAP-25-03) of the Planning Commission's denial of a variance (V-25-683) to permit a single-family residence and an accessory structure in excess of each structures' applicable height maximums at 3 Linda Lane:
 
A. Public hearing on CAP-25-03
 
B. Determination of CAP-25-03
A staff report was submitted by City Planner Nakeisha Planner and included in the May 27, 2025 City Council agenda packet.

Acting Deputy City Manager Michael Mays provided an overview of the Staff report.

In response to Council member Booth, Acting City Manager Mays said past examples of variances approved were included in the packet.  He also noted the structure would not be seen from Nevada Way.

In response to Council member Ashurst, Acting City Manager Mays said there were no state codes or regulations regarding this subject matter. He noted all of the departments reviewed the application request and they did not site any concerns with conflicts with utilities. 

Council member Jorgensen asked if there were past variances approved for accessory structures and Acting City Manager Mays confirmed yes.

Mayor Hardy said he drove by the subject matter and was comfortable that it wouldn’t be seen from the highway.

Council member Walton asked what height would be permitted if the garage were attached to the home and was informed it would be 25 feet.

Acting City Manager Mays said the height of the principle structure would be 4 feet higher than the accessory building.

Council member Booth said she drove by the property and they had no neighbors behind or on the side of them noting the lot was unique.

Mayor Hardy noted this was the time and place scheduled to conduct a public hearing and asked for public input.

Todd Martens said he and his wife Michelle owned the property and wanted to build a home for their retirement.  He said the property had been vacant for 40 years and had a steep grade. He said they would like to store their vehicle in the accessory garage noting no neighbors would be impacted by it.  

Council member Ashurst thanked them for doing their due diligence and going through the process.

No further comments were offered and the hearing was declared closed.

Council member Walton said there were extraordinary circumstances because of the slope of the north and south side. He said the lot was unique and challenging. He said he didn’t see a way to attach the garage in this unique circumstance. He said it definitely met the conditions required for a variance. He said he didn’t normally like using condition 3, but the property was so unique and he didn’t believe it would create a precedent. He also said it wouldn’t impact the comprehensive plan and said he didn’t have a problem reversing the variance.

Council member Booth said she and Council member Walton were former Planning Commissioners and appreciated the Planning Commissioner’s original decision.

Council Member Walton expressed appreciation for the Planning Commissions efforts..

Mayor Hardy noted the Planning Commission’s split vote and stated that, due to the unique characteristics of the lot, he felt comfortable supporting the variance.
Motion: Approve CAP-25-03 reversing the Planning Commissions decision and conditionally approve the variance based on criteria (findings 1-5) stated in Section 11-32-4  and conditions: 1) The proposed detached garage shall not be used as or converted to a dwelling unit; and 2)The variance approval is based on the plans and information submitted and discussed as part of the variance request, and the variance shall not apply to deviations to the plans if the scope of the variance is expanded beyond that shown on the plans and submitted information.  
Moved by: Council Member Cokie BoothSeconded by: Council Member Denise Ashurst
Vote:
Aye: Mayor Joe Hardy, Council Member Denise Ashurst, Council Member Cokie Booth, Council Member Sherri Jorgensen, Council Member Steve Walton (5)
Nay: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
Motion Passed
10.
For possible action: Matters pertaining to FY 2025-2026 Tentative and Final Budget:

A. Public Hearing on the FY 2025-2026 Tentative Budget (Notice published May 15, 2025 - Las Vegas Review Journal)

B. Resolution No. 7975, a resolution of the City Council of Boulder City, Nevada, establishing classification titles and position ranges for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 as required by City of Boulder City Municipal Code 1-5-5

C. Discussion and approval of the FY 2025-2026 Final Operating and Capital Budgets
A staff report was submitted by Finance Director Cynthia Sneed and included in the May 27, 2025 City Council agenda packet.

Budget Manager Angela Manninen said this was the third time the Fiscal Year 2026 budget in the amount of $46.8 million would be presented to the Council.  She said it was also presented at a residential workshop and to the Utility Advisory Committee.  She said there were no proposed changes to the budget at any of the meetings.  She noted before Council for consideration was a resolution establishing classification titles and position ranges for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 as required by City Code 1-5-5.

In response to Mayor Hardy, Budget Manager Manninen explained the handout provided at the meeting reflected an cost of living adjustment from monthly to annually for the appointed official’s contracts which resulted in a change from 2.3% to 2.6%.  She noted the range for the City Manager position was also updated. 

Mayor Hardy noted this was the time and place scheduled to conduct a public hearing and asked for public input. 

Jack Clary asked if he could be provided the handout information provided to Council and was informed they were also available to the public and located on the table at the back of the room.  

No further comments were offered and the hearing was declared closed.   
Motion: Approve Resolution No. 7975
Moved by: Council Member Steve WaltonSeconded by: Council Member Cokie Booth
Vote:
Aye: Mayor Joe Hardy, Council Member Denise Ashurst, Council Member Cokie Booth, Council Member Sherri Jorgensen, Council Member Steve Walton (5)
Nay: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
Motion Passed
Motion: Approve the FY 2025-2026 Final Operating and Capital Budgets
Moved by: Council Member Steve WaltonSeconded by: Council Member Sherri Jorgensen
Vote:
Aye: Mayor Joe Hardy, Council Member Denise Ashurst, Council Member Cokie Booth, Council Member Sherri Jorgensen, Council Member Steve Walton (5)
Nay: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
Motion Passed
11.
For possible action: Matters pertaining to the Nevada Way Reconstruction, B.C. Project No. 20-1114-STR:

A. Resolution No. 7976, a resolution of the City Council of Boulder City, Nevada, awarding a bid to Unicon LLC, in the amount not to exceed $2,645,795.00 for the Nevada Way Reconstruction, B.C. Project No. 20-1114-STR

B. Resolution No. 7977, a resolution of the City Council of Boulder City, Nevada, approving Agreement No. 25-031 between the City of Boulder City and Wilson Engineers LLC. in the amount of $180,650.00 to provide construction management services for the Nevada Way Reconstruction, B.C. Project No. 20-1114-STR
A staff report was submitted by Public Works Director Gary Poindexter and included in the May 27, 2025 City Council agenda packet.

Public Works Director Poindexter provided an overview of the Staff report. He said a town hall meeting was held to discuss the downtown parking projects and many good suggestions had been shared with staff.  He said as a result of a parking demonstration, City Staff determined it best to switch to one of the other options met the requirements necessary for RTC’s Complete Streets.  He said he also met personally with most of the business owners and sent surveys to the businesses along Nevada Way between Arizona Street and Wyoming Street. He said the revised configuration supports the goals for a complete street which includes a design to improve safety accessibility and include accommodations for disabled persons as required by the ADA.  He noted the trees would be preserved while maintaining a 24 foot clearance and parking for longer vehicles, motorcycle parking, and improved crosswalks.  He said regardless of the design, the roadway, utilities and water system needed to be redone because they were more than 50 years old.  He said parking spots would be reduced regardless of the design in order to comply with the City Code.  He said the construction would take place Sunday through Friday during overnight hours and reopened by 6:00 a.m. in an effort to be less disruptive to the businesses. He said they were hoping to begin construction July 7 and end before the Wurst Fest event on September 27, 2025.  He said Staff would also be working to update the requirements, fees and enforcement of an encroachment permit.  He said the design had to be considered carefully because the pillars on the porticoes were not uniform.  He said the designated walkways would be sawcut colored cement so it could be easily identified.    

Council member Jorgensen said she’s heard really great suggestions from the public and thanked staff for their willingness to consider other ideas.  She asked how the changes would make the downtown area better for businesses, residents, visitors and ADA needs.  She said she appreciated staff reaching out to the business owners and the ADA group.  She said she has heard from members of the community asking if the need for a walkway would be necessary if the tables in the encroachment area were reconfigured.  She said she understood the need for a complete street because the condition of the road was well beyond a street slurry solution and said the aging infrastructure needed to be addressed.  She said she liked the idea of nighttime work so it doesn’t impede with the businesses, community and visitors during the day.  She asked what the requirements were for a complete street to be funded by the Regional Transportation Commission.

Public Works Director Poindexter said a complete street included asphalt removal, pedestrian access, ramp updates, and was required to comply with current codes. He said the current parking spaces were not long enough to accommodate the length of newer trucks.  He said one way to accomplish it would include parallel parking on one side of the street and angling the parking spaces on the other side of the street at 30 degrees.  He said, however, this plan would result in fewer parking spaces overall.    

Council member Jorgensen said she liked the idea of adding additional parking on Wyoming Street, but she expressed concern with including parallel parking on Nevada Way because it inhibits traffic.

Public Works Director Poindexter said per the City Code, parallel parking spots were 24 feet long and it would included striped spots similar to the parking on Ash Street, Fifth Street, Arizona Street, and Wyoming Street.  

Council member Jorgensen said she was hearing the comments about enforcing the encroachment permits and asked what impact that might have on the businesses, particularly if it would hurt businesses financially.   She said there were many blighted buildings without open business and that was concerning to her.  She said walkways were important, but she did not want to create additional problems by solving one. 


Public Works Director Poindexter said he understood the concerns and said staff looked at many different options including making the downtown one-way, but the impact to the neighboring streets such as Cherry and Birch were too great. 

Council member Jorgensen acknowledged staff had taken into account each group that came to them with ideas and concerns.  She said she understood it was difficult to make everyone happy.  She concurred the timeframe for construction should take place during the slowest business season with the least impact.

Council member Booth said there was a lot of discussion about having covered walkways stating not every business in town had a covered walkway. 


Public Works Director Poindexter confirmed 8 out of the 24 businesses along Nevada Way had a covered walkway.

Council member Booth went on to say it was important to promote small businesses so they can flourish.  She said it was important to have the walkway on the outside of the portico because the inside area was congested with patrons and servers.  She said it would be difficult to maintain the inside area during busy weekends and events. She said most of the sidewalks in Boulder City were not covered.  She praised public works for listening to everyone’s concerns.  She said it would be so much easier to walk on a saw cut walkway because it had a smoother surface which was easier to walk along and push things such as a baby stroller.  She said she was also in favor of adding color to the walkway so it was easily identified as a path.  She said she thought the project was a win-win for patrons and businesses.  She said it was important to work it out without receiving code enforcement citations which would not be beneficial for attracting business. 

In response to Council member Ashurst, Public Works Director Poindexter said the complete street requirements could be met if the parking spaces were not changed; however, they would not meet the requirements of the City Code.  He also agreed that the encroachment permits needed revised language to hold businesses accountable if they did not comply.  He said that matter would come back for Council approval at a future meeting because it required a lot of updates such as the City being named as an additional insured. 

Council member Ashurst said it was important that self-enforcement, business enforcement and police enforcement of the encroachment area were all aligned or the situation would remain unchanged.  She expressed concern about citizens walking in the sun and suggested the walkway be shaded. 

City Manager Thomas said the project was in three parts: 1) reconstruction of the street; replacement of aging utilities; improve parking, crosswalks/pedestrian which would be beneficial to all; 2) enforcement; and 3) reform encroachment permits.  He said the improvements would be beneficial to everyone.   He said Public Works Director Poindexter had done a really good job trying meet all of the concerns expressed for a complicated area that included many interests.

Council member Ashurst asked if there were other solutions to eliminate parallel parking and still make it ADA compliant.


Public Works Director Poindexter said the parking could be left as is and have stronger encroachment permit enforcement; however, it does not meet the current City Code requirements for parking and the issue of longer vehicles not fitting within the designated space would remain unresolved. 

In response to Council member Ashurst, Public Works Director Poindexter said it was important to approve the funding for the project.  He said the decision about the design could be postponed, however, it could delay the projected start date on July 7, 2025 which could be detrimental to the businesses. He discussed spending $70-80K for a slurry seal which would be a temporary solution but it was not a guaranteed solution. He said the current road condition was terrible.

Council member Ashurst said businesses reached out to her and were originally in favor of center parking.  She said this issue had been discussed since 2021. 

Public Works Director Poindexter said during some of the conversations, it was brought to his attention that another water fountain was desired in addition to the one currently located on Arizona Street and Nevada Way.  He said staff would consider installing another one at the other end of the downtown area and said signage and street markings would also be addressed. 

Council member Walton asked if different options had been presented to the businesses.

In response to Council member Walton, City Engineer Jim Keane said he and Economic Development Coordinator Raffi Festekjian met with most of the businesses owners and they were not in favor of one of the options presented because they would lose table and chair space. 

Council member Walton asked if the square footage had been measured or was the concern about losing table and chair space subjective and C
ity Engineer Keane concurred it was subjective.

Council member Walton said it was important that the City hold itself accountable and comply with the City Code as the City required of other businesses and development.  He said no matter what design was selected, there would be fewer parking spaces.  He asked if the 8 parallel spots were changed to angled parking, how many parking spots would be available. 
    

Public Works Director Poindexter said it would be configured differently, but the number of spaces would be similar.

In response to Council member Walton’s concern about the front or back car bumper extending onto the sidewalk, Public Works Director Poindexter said with the additional 4 feet of concrete, there would be a total of 7 feet outside of the portico with parking bumpers to help resolve that issue. 

In response to Council member Ashurst, Public Works Director Poindexter said some of the designs being considered were festive gates to be used to close down the street during events with bollards added as a safety measure.  He said after the discussion tonight, the would evaluable including removable bollards instead of festive gates.    

Mayor Hardy said, in essence, the City was giving away free land with the approval of encroachment permits to support the businesses.  He said encroachment permits needed to be reevaluated and include much stronger enforcement. He said he did not believe the City should spend money to slurry the road because the City had an obligation to repair the road.  He said, overall, parking spaces would be increased with the number of parking spots made available on Nevada Way and Wyoming Street.  He said parallel parking had been considered to accommodate the space needed for fire engines.  He said ADA concerns would not be addressed if the City did not make changes. 


Council member Walton questioned whether a 4-foot extension on the north side would be sufficient for fire truck access.

Public Works Director Poindexter responded that he was initially unsure until he conducted research which revealed 27’ foot roads were required by code.

Council member Walton expressed a preference for minimal changes, acknowledging that the roadway would need adjustments but suggest the layout could be modified instead. He emphasized that residents and visitors want to preserve outdoor dining and asked if the goal could be met by simply altering table and chair arrangements.

City Manager Thomas said if 48” of concrete was added to the existing sidewalk under the canopy, the necessary space for tables would be lost and there would not be a designated ADA walkway.  

City Attorney Walker said added enforcement would be difficult regardless because of the nature of tables and chairs moving around.  She also said not having a designated walkway made it even more challenging for ADA compliance.

Mayor Hardy called a 10 minute recess at 8:47 p.m.

Mayor Hardy called the meeting back to order at 9:04 p.m.

After a lengthy discussion City Manager Thomas suggested the City Council table the item and ask staff to return it to the June 10th meeting with additional details on street widths, sidewalk dimensions, feedback from the business owners along Nevada Way, and provide exhibits showing the reconfigured parking and extended sidewalks.


In response to Mayor Hardy, Public Works Director Poindexter said bringing the matter back on June 10th would make the timeline more challenging, but confirmed the project could still begin as planned. 
 
Motion: Table the item to the June 10th meeting and bring back additional details on street widths and sidewalk dimensions, feedback from business owners along Nevada Way, and exhibits showing the reconfigured parking and extended sidewalks.
Moved by: Council Member Denise AshurstSeconded by: Council Member Cokie Booth
Vote:
Aye: Mayor Joe Hardy, Council Member Denise Ashurst, Council Member Cokie Booth, Council Member Sherri Jorgensen, Council Member Steve Walton (5)
Nay: (0)
Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0)
Motion Passed
12.
City Manager’s Report Claims Paid Report
A staff report was submitted by Finance Director Cynthia Sneed and included in the May 27, 2025 City Council agenda packet.

City Manager Thomas said there was nothing unusual to report.
13.
City Manager’s Report Financial Report (unaudited)
A staff report was submitted by Finance Director Cynthia Sneed and included in the May 27, 2025 City Council agenda packet.

City Manager Thomas said there was nothing unusual to report.
PUBLIC COMMENT
 
Mayor Hardy opened the public comment period. 

Jack Clary thanked the City Council and said he was disappointed Item No. 8 did not receive as much consideration as Item No 11.

Brandon Smith thanked the Council and Public Works Director Poindexter for their consideration for the downtown street project and for making Boulder City a great place to live. He suggested a vacancy tax for businesses along Nevada Way that were empty and not doing anything productive.  He said Nevada Way was the Golden Pathway to the city and said it was important to keep Nevada Way as beautiful as possible.  He asked the Council to please consider this request at a future meeting.

Cindy Blatchford thanked the Council for postponing the consideration of Nevada Way project.  She suggested a partnership for parking such as working with the park service for use of their building as well as the Wells Fargo bank parking lot.

No further comments were offered and the public comment period was closed. 

Written public comments submitted prior to the meeting via public comment form or email are attached:

Susan Reams
CITY COUNCIL'S REPORT
Council Member Jorgensen expressed appreciation to everyone who supported the Best Dam Barbecue event. She extended congratulations to the graduating seniors and thanked the Sunrise Rotary for sponsoring the All-Night Senior Party. She thanked all who have served our country.

Council member Booth said attending the Memorial Day ceremony at the cemetery was a meaningful and moving experience. She noted that she assisted, alongside Council member Walton, at the Best Dam Barbecue event.

Council Member Ashurst thanked Chris Naylor at the Veterans Cemetery for his support, noting the cemetery was a resting place for loved ones who would never be forgotten. She shared that it was an honor to serve for 20 years and expressed her gratitude to the families of those who have served.

Council member Walton said serving offered the opportunity to work with other individuals in Clark County. He said he was appreciative to have seen other dignitaries at the Memorial Day ceremony.  He said visitation substantially was decreasing in Nevada and there were fewer nonstop flights into Las Vegas.  He said the Consolidated Tax (C-Tax) had been reduced for all local municipalities and emphasized the importance of focusing on how to supplement revenue in light of that reduction. He said solar leases were important to the economy of Boulder City.  He said the proceeds from the Boulder City Rotary supported local nonprofits.  He also discussed Boulder City Sunrise Rotary’s Wursfest event on the last Saturday of September noting the proceeds helped support the All Night Senior Party. He spoke about Memorial Day and thanked the public for their written, phone in and in person comments.  

Mayor Hardy also commented about the Garrett Junior Highschool Band and Choir and how fantastic they were doing. He said Boulder City was blessed with many wonderful things and was appreciative of the City Council, staff and lobbyist who were working hard in Carson City. He said he appreciated the fuel revenue indexing and how it benefited Boulder City. He noted that any discussion about the RTC wouldn't even be possible without the funding generated by the indexing. He added that many developments, such as the I-11 project, have happened as a direct result of the fuel revenue indexing. He shared that he had the personal opportunity to visit the cemetery at 6 a.m. on Memorial Day to locate and honor his wife’s family members.

Mayor Hardy adjourned the meeting at 9:36 p.m.

__________________________________
Joe Hardy, Mayor



ATTEST:


__________________________________
Tami McKay, City Clerk